Tag Archives: jazz composition

If I Were A Rich Man [MP3], and the Epiphany

What a day. My house is both spotless & dreadfully quiet right now, and I am exhausted. I dropped my iPod this afternoon, and now when I turn it on, it greets me with a frowny face and a URL for Apple Support. Oh Apple, how cheeky.

I have a new recording to share. I actually finished it late last night, but a strange thing happened before I had a chance to write it up & post it. You see, we had a really wet snow last night. And when I went to fold my laundry, I found that a portion of that awesome wetness was dripping in through my exterior wall into my bedroom. Needless to say my attention was required until the wee hours of the morning, and I slept on the couch. Likewise, today was spent rendering my home impeccable such that I might host representatives of the condominium management company for review about what to do. But I digress.

Continue reading

Three-Note Per String Theorem & Pitch Axis

Hi there.

It’s Sunday night, it’s getting late, and my brain is a little scrambled. If you know anything about guitar playing, and have read this blog before (and aren’t just one of my friends checking up on my ramblings…), you may have noticed that I am a proponent of the Three-Note Per String System of fretboard organization. Yeah, I know, CAGED. Haven’t really put the effort into that one yet. So anyways…  Continue reading

Next Level Sweep Picking

Well, it’s damn early in the morning, so it must be the perfect time to reflect on the wonder that is all around us known as music. If only to interrupt terrible dreams about climbing the Great Wall of France. Who knew they had a Great Wall in France? And that it has a tram? Must be close to EuroDisney.

So yesterday I was driving home from work listening to the local jazz station when I had an epiphany. This epiphany was facilitated by a weekend spent under the influence of the flu, with nothing else to do but lie in bed and sweep pick. And because this is an epiphany that I have never seen anywhere in any magazine, web post, lesson, video, etc, I am forced to accept that perhaps this might not be part of the public lexicon for sweep picking. But it’s soooooo easy.  Continue reading

Thinking in Intervals

Do you think in intervals, or in notes?

When I first started getting into music, I only thought in notes. I only memorized notes, and scale shapes. I used to have sheets and sheets of notes from songs I figured out. I understood what intervals were, but I didn’t think in intervals. I didn’t care.  Continue reading

Reader Mail – Episode 2: Music Theory vs. Songwriting

Hey kids

I have some hate mail for your viewing pleasure today. My only comments are as follows:

1. Music theory does not equal songwriting or music business success. Success comes from attitude, enthusiasm, and determination. The real talent is in maintaining your composure & motivation in the face of adversity and criticism. Be unapologetic; don’t waste your time apologizing for being who you are. That’s called integrity, and will bring you respect.

2. Don’t live your life in anger or spite. It’s a waste of time and energy. Plus, negativity does nothing but draw more negativity into your life.

I have had the good fortune of meeting tons of talented, creative, knowledgeable, and exceptional musicians, and have also had the pleasure of watching all of them open for my ridiculously popular, untalented band. With that in mind, a concerned reader writes:

Ok – so obviously you don’t know much about music or music theory, which is fine, if you weren’t so arrogant, c.f. “Trust me guys you aren’t helping your case”. Try and learn about something before writing it off. I work with a lot of extremely talented jazz musicians who not only have great technique and great theoretical knowledge but also great ears. You can’t be a good musician without all three. I’m betting you got pretty good ears but not the first two… Nowadays EVERY good session musician in EVERY genre (including pop) knows (jazz) music theory and uses it to make great music (and money).

None of these “math chords” (as you so ignorantly describe them) were just made up – they’re theories used to describe what sounds good. That’s why it’s called music theory not music fact. Check out the history of music theory (jazz and classical) it’s full of people coming up with ways of describing what SOUNDS GOOD. And if you’re smart you can use and build on these “rules” to make good music rather than re-inventing a crappy heavily plagiarised version of the wheel. There was only one guy with Bach’s knowledge of, and ear for, harmony – it ain’t me and it certainly ain’t you. Loads of good music has been written using ‘math’ chords because they sound great when used well and they have a musical function. You can find them in every style pop, jazz, rock, classical – you name it…

Regarding harmonising the melodic minor – people have been using that for hundreds of years. Let me save you some time: Mi(Ma7), b9sus4, Maj7(+5), Dom7(+11), Mi(Ma7)/5th, Hal-Dim(+9) and finally the altered chord – the most beautiful of all. This last one is the most useful and is “the” sound that makes cry me a river so beautiful. All of these chords sound beautiful when used well and dovetail wonderfully with the ‘math’ chords you so foolishly dismiss.

Seriously, just stop being so closed-minded, take a course on music theory and learn that all the music you already love uses these ideas. Even a song as timeless and catchy as Yesterday uses borrowed (i.e. non-diatonic chords) and “jazz” ideas.

Good luck!

P.S. If you don’t take that course, at least look up the definition of “diatonic” you keep using it wrongly

I’ve reached that point in my life when it’s time to get fat.

So I’m learning fat chords, and fat chord arrangements of 12-bar bebop & swing. Now you know.

Thanks, All Blues for Jazz Guitar by Jim Ferguson

Vocal Comping to Spit Your Lyrics Faster

Well, it’s way past my bedtime, so you know what that means: my writing skills are at their utmost peak. It’s your lucky day.

I’m going to bed soon, but I tried writing this long blog about different ways to write vocal parts and it ended up boring as a parliamentary debate with the sound off. Needless to say, quite boring. Quite quite quite.

I’ma hit chu wit dis right quick, and give you a little tidbit each blog. So this is only ONE recommendation for writing vocals, with others to follow in other blogs. This one focuses on how to get more words out in less time. We are going to use other people’s music to help us to do that.

Singing other people’s music is always easier than singing your own, and we can often perform other people’s music much more convincingly than our own. Why is that?

Really, it’s repetition. So if we are to be able to give a quality performance, your song must become other people’s music

Ok, so let’s say you have your lyrics written and in front of you. Now spit them over your bed (that’s backing track, for the squares), working loosely, and track it.

Some syllables will lock to the beat, and sound good. These are called in the pocket. As in Polly Pocket. Or pocket pool. Or perhaps “Polly Pocket Pool”.

Others will not be in the pocket. Delete the parts that do not lock to the rhythm. Mute the vocal track take.

Spit your lyrics again, working loosely, delete the parts that don’t work. If the second take is the same as the first take, you are not spitting your lyrics fast enough. Spit faster. Experiment. Take a risk for once in your life; this isn’t junior prom.

Do this ad nauseum.

Use the undeleted parts to create a continuous vocal track. So what if some lyrics appear a bar later. Quantize to quarter notes and move it earlier in the song, so that it follows immediately on the previous part. The quarter notes will ensure that even though you move the part, it is still on the down beat. If that doesn’t work well enough, go to half notes. If you dare! No but really, half notes won’t change the relationship between the vocal rhythm & beat. Unless you have the beat at the wrong tempo. Should be 4 beats to a bar. You might have it at double or half time, in which figure it out yourself.

Print the vocal track to a format that can be put on disc or on your Apple-like iMP3 iplayer and take it with you wherever you go. Listen to it. Pretend it’s a real song, and memorize it. Now your song can become other people’s music, and become ingrained in your psyche.

Come back to the track at a later date, and record the vocals as a single pass. It will just be like recording a cover, but of your own original lyrics.

And that’s how it’s done my friends.

D

Crossing over: When Blues Becomes Swing & Bebop

So over the weekend a friend of mine gave me copies of two books which have really taken me aback at how little I really know:

All Blues for Jazz Guitar by Jim Ferguson
All Blues Soloing for Jazz Guitar by Jim Ferguson

Let’s skip to the point of this article:
1. Good vocabulary of 12-bar variations, each from a different sub-genre
2. These identities are collected in Chapter 1 of each book
3. Chapter 1 of each book can be viewed online through Amazon.com

I’m really enjoying working with all these different forms for playing 12-bar, and seeing how some incorporate VI-ii-V-I and chromatic bassline movement. Also it’s actually kind of embarrassing how reliant Tonight You Belong To Me is on these 12-bar variations. And that I didn’t really notice before…

Happy comping